Wait. Pause. Look a little deeper. One my my friends and colleagues, Jeffrey Lacasse, published a letter in JAMA offering some dialectical discussion on this as well as another letter in BMJ after they'd discovered that the researcher failed to disclose funding provided by the maker of the drug. One consumer advocate writes in detail about the draconian sequel that ensued, directed toward Leo and Lacasse.
Ah, the quandary. I will resist the urge to amass evidence, often under-reported, regarding duplicitous relationships and the ethical implications of such travesties.
Instead, I offer my thoughts on our proclivities toward the short-cut to healing. In sum, there is no way to bypass suffering as a part of the human condition. Clinical depression that is endogenous is vastly different from that which rises from the exogenous, a particularly traumatic event or circumstance. Yet, some fail to recognize this, and in so doing, they marginalize some of the most important healing potentialities of the human condition: people. Whether it be in the psychotherapeutic relationship or generalized social support vis-a-vis friends and neighbors, you simply cannot compare the benefits of positive human relationships with psychopharmaceuticals. Trying to do so, I would posit, is not only inherently dangerous to the individual who is depressed, but it also abdicates the responsibility that we all have to care for one another and to take the time to really be with each other through the ebb and flow of life.
There simply is no pill that can act as a proxy. There is no pharmacy that can fill the visceral need for compassionate interactions with other humans. There is no panacean riposte. Instead, the answer to human suffering is both within us and between us.
6 comments:
Perfectly said, or I guess I should say written. Your words are pure truth! Thank you.
Yes, a pill doesn't do what a hug, a shoulder, and an ear can do. (Love the new look in your blog, very striking!)
You know the thing that interests me though? When people most need the other people instead of drugs -- it is precisely then that it is hardest to ask for help. AND others seem repelled by people who need/ask for help and support. Like vulnerability is a catching disease. I mean I get it. Really, and of course I think it is right on the nose that we need people more than pills. But when you are least able to be your own advocate, how do we teach people to be their own advocate and get connections made. ?? babbling... just thinking a lot about that this week in particular.
xoxox
me
This is why the responsibility to care is so crucial. There is a sociomoral onus that is compromised in our culture. We slough off those emotions attached to humans to which we are averse. It's a dangerous cycle of compassion's antithesis, apathy.
As far as others' initiative to reach out, so much depends on the milieu. It's a hostile world, often unsympathetic. Those who have unconditional love and support through their lives learn they *can* rely on others...those who have not, often don't trust in that.
Wow. Profound.
XOOX
Hi Joanne,
I nominated your blog for a Sisterhood Award. You can see the post on my blog at: http://faulknercarpenter.blogspot.com/2009/04/sisterhood-award.html
Thank you for all that you do.
The rules of the award are:
Put the logo on your blog or post.
Nominate at least 10 blogs with great attitude and/or gratitude.
Be sure to link to your nominees in your post.
Let your nominees know they have received the award by leaving them a comment on their blog.
Be sure to link this post to the person who nominated you for the award.
Much care,
Jessie
I nominated you fr an award. Please stop by my blog.
Post a Comment